Connect with us

LATEST NEWS

Supreme Court to Hear Challenges to Biden’s Student Debt Relief Plan – Live | united states politics Story-level

Avatar

Published

on

The stakes in the supreme court are higher than just the student debt program

If the supreme court finds Joe Biden did not have the legal authority to relieve up to $20,000 in student debt for tens of millions of American borrowers, the effects could extend beyond the president’s flagship program.

As Bloomberg Law reports, the court could use the “top questions doctrine” to strike down the program, a relatively recent legal theory that conservative justices deployed in a ruling that limited the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency last year. If the six-judge block, which was responsible for several of the court’s most controversial rulings last year, including the finale of Roe v Wade, chooses to expand the doctrine, it could drastically complicate government agencies’ ability to regulate.

“The practical effect would be that federal agencies could only solve problems that existed when the relevant statute was enacted, and that any new problems must wait for Congress to act (which would generally mean that those problems would languish, and other solutions, such as actions by state governments, as well as private actors, might have to fill the gaps),” according to the Bloomberg Law.

that said, political reports that the White House believes it has an ace up its sleeve. “We are confident that we are going to win because the other side has no position,” said a person familiar with Biden administration thinking. If the court finds that the plaintiffs do not have standing to sue, that could be enough to allow the program to take effect.

If the supreme court finds Joe Biden did not have the legal authority to relieve as much as $20,000 in student debt for tens of millions of American borrowers, the effects could stretch beyond just the president’s signature program.

“,”elementId”:”4b66bda8-b972-47cd-921f-8ce1301c6b42″,”_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

As Bloomberg Law reports, the court could make use of the “major questions doctrine” to strike down the program, a relatively recent legal theory that conservative justices deployed in a ruling limiting the Environmental Protection Agency’s authority last year. If the six-justice bloc, which was responsible for a number of the court’s most contentious rulings last year including the end of Roe v Wade, opts to expand the doctrine, it could dramatically complicate the ability of government agencies to regulate.

“,”elementId”:”71493a85-55e9-4772-88e0-4c3516e65dbc”,”_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

“The practical effect would be that federal agencies could only solve problems that existed when the relevant statute was enacted, and that any new problems must wait for Congress to act (which generally would mean those issues would languish, and other solutions, such as actions from state governments as well as private actors, might have to fill the gaps),” according to Bloomberg Law.

“,”elementId”:”7b9537d2-deb9-4e79-8c27-ef0430c64c49″,”_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

That said, Politico reports that the White House believes it has an ace up its sleeve. “We’re confident we’re going to win because the other side doesn’t have standing,” a person familiar with the Biden administration’s thinking said. If the court finds the plaintiffs don’t have standing to sue, that could be enough to allow the program to go into effect.

“,”elementId”:”153d0f91-65bd-4d1e-86a8-a14035d6ea41″],”attributes”:”pinned”:true,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false,”blockCreatedOn”:1677592203000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”13.50 GMT”,”blockLastUpdated”:1677593676000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”14.14 GMT”,”blockFirstPublished”:1677593676000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”14.14 GMT”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”14.14″,”title”:”Stakes at supreme court higher than just student debt program”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 28 Feb 2023 15.19 GMT”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 28 Feb 2023 13.49 GMT”,”id”:”63fe00368f08e6fa0007a914″,”elements”:[“_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

Good morning, US politics blog readers. Joe Biden’s plan to provide some student debt relief to tens of millions of Americans will be before the supreme court today, which will hear two cases brought by conservatives challenging the proposal. There’s no telling how the court – which is composed of six conservative justices and three liberals – will rule on the petitions, which argue the president does not have the legal authority to provide relief. But a ruling striking the program down or limiting it would be a major loss for the White House. We may get a sense of which way the justices are leaning in today’s oral arguments.

“,”elementId”:”d141a2d4-f29b-4cfe-bea3-8c8157ae3093″,”_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

Here’s what else is going on today:

“,”elementId”:”7f4e38d0-4226-41cf-ba90-ac3305dbfe4a”,”_type”:”model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.TextBlockElement”,”html”:”

    \n

  • Republicans in the House of Representatives will vote on a bill that would bar retirement funds from sustainable investing.

  • \n

  • The House select committee on competition with the Chinese Communist party will hold its first hearing during the primetime TV hour, at 7 pm eastern time.

  • \n

  • Biden is heading to Virginia Beach, Virginia, where he’ll speak about his efforts to lower healthcare costs.

  • \n

“,”elementId”:”3e67b0a5-ab2e-43cf-9f8e-61e3aa62f96d”],”attributes”:”pinned”:false,”keyEvent”:true,”summary”:false,”blockCreatedOn”:1677592154000,”blockCreatedOnDisplay”:”13.49 GMT”,”blockLastUpdated”:1677591553000,”blockLastUpdatedDisplay”:”13.39 GMT”,”blockFirstPublished”:1677592154000,”blockFirstPublishedDisplay”:”13.49 GMT”,”blockFirstPublishedDisplayNoTimezone”:”13.49″,”title”:”Supreme court to hear conservative challenges to Biden’s student debt relief plan”,”contributors”:[],”primaryDateLine”:”Tue 28 Feb 2023 15.19 GMT”,”secondaryDateLine”:”First published on Tue 28 Feb 2023 13.49 GMT”],”filterKeyEvents”:false,”format”:”display”:0,”theme”:0,”design”:10,”id”:”key-events-carousel-mobile””>

key events

Republican House Speaker Kevin McCarthy plans to make tens of thousands of hours of surveillance footage recorded on January 6 available to the public, Punchbowl News reports:

MCCARTHY, in closed R mtg, addressed his decision to give Jan. 6 security footage to @TuckerCarlson
he has argued transparency is good.
but today, in the closed meeting, he also mentioned that no one questioned J6 cmte releasing Pence's escape route/Pelosi's daughter's footage

— Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) February 28, 2023

\n”,”url”:”https://twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/1630582790113705987″,”id”:”1630582790113705987″,”hasMedia”:false,”role”:”inline”,”isThirdPartyTracking”:false,”source”:”Twitter”,”elementId”:”9d02ff5c-af56-4077-bfaa-2f238847d6cd””>

MCCARTHY, in a closed meeting, addressed his decision to release security footage from January 6 to @TuckerCarlson
He has argued that transparency is good.
but today in the closed meeting, he also mentioned that no one questioned J6 cmte divulging Pence’s escape route/Pelosi’s daughter footage

—Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) February 28, 2023

MCCARTHY said he will release the tapes to the public and let the American people decide.

This got applause from the room

— Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) February 28, 2023

\n”,”url”:”https://twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/1630583347742212096″,”id”:”1630583347742212096″,”hasMedia”:false,”role”:”inline”,”isThirdPartyTracking”:false,”source”:”Twitter”,”elementId”:”e05d302e-ca30-48ed-ae87-93f6a6bc4213″”>

MCCARTHY said he will release the tapes to the public and let the American people decide.

This got applause from the room.

—Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) February 28, 2023

Democrats were furious last week when it emerged that McCarthy had turned over the nearly 40,000 hours of footage to tucker carlson the right-wing commentator who is the most popular on Fox News, and has repeatedly downplayed the severity of the insurrection.

One of two cases the Supreme Court will hear today challenging Joe Biden’s student debt relief program was brought by six Republican-led states.

Iowa is among that group, and its attorney general brenna bird appeared on Fox News this morning to discuss her objections to the case and (unsurprisingly, if you’ve heard Republican elected officials speak recently) disparaged gender studies titles.

Here’s a clip:

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird on opposing student debt forgiveness: "Many Americans decide to go straight into the workforce or start a business, start a family, go into into the military, they shouldn't be forced to pay for someone else's gender studies degree …" pic.twitter.com/2ZQTxPINSp

— The Recount (@therecount) February 28, 2023

\n”,”url”:”https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1630566745093144576″,”id”:”1630566745093144576″,”hasMedia”:false,”role”:”inline”,”isThirdPartyTracking”:false,”source”:”Twitter”,”elementId”:”b731d2c9-31d5-4e98-a065-bfc27c4a0ad9″”>

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird on opposition to student debt forgiveness: “So many Americans decide to go straight into the workforce or start a business, start a family, go into the military, they shouldn’t be forced to pay the someone else’s gender studies degree…” pic.twitter.com/2ZQTxPINSp

— The Count (@therecount) February 28, 2023

Supporters of the Biden administration’s student debt relief plan are gathering in front of the supreme court ahead of the start of the hearing at 10 a.m. on the challenges against them:

Hello from the Supreme Court!🏛️

We’re joining hundreds of allies at the People’s Rally for Student Debt Cancellation this morning in support of President Biden’s student debt cancellation plan.

Follow along in the thread below! @theSBPC pic.twitter.com/Zz5vn6FEhh

— AFT (@AFTunion) February 28, 2023

\n”,”url”:”https://twitter.com/AFTunion/status/1630561180723949569″,”id”:”1630561180723949569″,”hasMedia”:false,”role”:”inline”,”isThirdPartyTracking”:false,”source”:”Twitter”,”elementId”:”fd2ace37-54d3-4b43-a13d-02ff731ebfa8″”>

Hello from the Supreme Court! 🏛️

We joined hundreds of allies in the People’s March to Cancel Student Debt this morning in support of President Biden’s plan to cancel student debt.

Follow the thread below! @elSBPC pic.twitter.com/Zz5vn6FEhh

-AFT (@AFTunion) February 28, 2023

Right, @SenatorMenendez: The #AmericanRescuePlan has a clause that says an student loan forgiveness between the end of 2020 and beginning of 2026 cannot be taxed as income. #CancelStudentDebt pic.twitter.com/opyFoCo4v3

— AFT (@AFTunion) February 28, 2023

\n”,”url”:”https://twitter.com/AFTunion/status/1630569779051352070″,”id”:”1630569779051352070″,”hasMedia”:false,”role”:”inline”,”isThirdPartyTracking”:false,”source”:”Twitter”,”elementId”:”239e6f02-79e1-4daa-b322-14e7f73b6c72″”/>

The stakes in the supreme court are higher than just the student debt program

If the supreme court finds Joe Biden did not have the legal authority to relieve up to $20,000 in student debt for tens of millions of American borrowers, the effects could extend beyond the president’s flagship program.

As Bloomberg Law reports, the court could use the “top questions doctrine” to strike down the program, a relatively recent legal theory that conservative justices deployed in a ruling that limited the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency last year. If the six-judge block, which was responsible for several of the court’s most controversial rulings last year, including the finale of Roe v Wade, chooses to expand the doctrine, it could drastically complicate government agencies’ ability to regulate.

“The practical effect would be that federal agencies could only solve problems that existed when the relevant statute was enacted, and that any new problems must wait for Congress to act (which would generally mean that those problems would languish, and other solutions, such as actions by state governments, as well as private actors, might have to fill the gaps),” according to the Bloomberg Law.

that said, political reports that the White House believes it has an ace up its sleeve. “We are confident that we are going to win because the other side has no position,” said a person familiar with Biden administration thinking. If the court finds that the plaintiffs do not have standing to sue, that could be enough to allow the program to take effect.

Supreme Court to Hear Conservative Challenges to Biden’s Student Debt Relief Plan

Good morning, readers of the American politics blog. Joe BidenThe plan to provide some student debt relief to tens of millions of Americans will be before the Supreme Court today, which will hear two cases brought by conservatives challenging the proposal. It is not known how the court, which is made up of six conservative and three liberal judges, will rule on the petitions, which argue that the president does not have the legal authority to provide relief. But a ruling that strikes down the program or limits it would be a huge loss for the White House. We can get an idea of ​​which way the judges lean in today’s oral arguments.

This is what else is happening today:

  • republicans The House of Representatives will vote on a bill that would prevent retirement funds from making sustainable investments.

  • The House Select Committee on the competition with the Chinese Communist Party will hold its first hearing during primetime television at 7 pm ET.

  • Biden heads to Virginia Beach, Virginia, where he will speak about his efforts to reduce health care costs.

Copyright © 2023 Story Level Media.